|
Cellular
Manufacturing at India's largest Aircraft Manufacturer
|
The
Company is a reputed manufacturer and supplier of a Military Aircraft
and Aerospace sub-systems in India. |
Due
to the multi-project nature of business, the management staff at
the company's division in Bangalore were facing a problem in the
task of Production Scheduling and WIP tracking. The changing priorities
were further adding to the complexity. |
The
management then invited Kaul Associates (KA) to study their process
and identify improvement opportunities. |
| |
| Study
of “AS IS” System |
| This
was carried out in the following manner for the range of products:
|
 |
Grouping
of components :
Components required in manufacture were broadly divided into 16
families based on the concept of Group technology. |
 |
Lead
Time :
Actual lead time taken to manufacture 22 randomly selected components,
two from each family, was computed and analysed to find out percentage
of actual work content to lead time. This was found to vary between
20% to 1%. |
 |
Set-up
Time :
Based on the batch quantities, the percentage of set-up time to
cycle time was computed to be 40% at an average. |
 |
Inventory:
The value of work-in-process inventory was computed and the inventory
turns in number of months was found to be 15.3. |
 |
Flow
Paths:
The actual flow paths moved by the components in the process of
manufacture was mapped and found to vary between 5.2 km and 0.1
km. |
 |
Shortage
Analysis :
A shortage analysis was made for a selected engine which revealed
that about 60% of shortages came from ‘C' class items like pipes
& fittings and hardware. |
| |
|
| Summary
of Observations and Findings |
Based
on the study of the system, the probable causes of the existing
problems were identified to be: |
 |
Process
oriented shop organisation and complex flow paths |
 |
Shop
organisation not focused leading to diffused ownership of quality
and delivery. |
 |
Production
hold-ups due to: |
| |
 |
Inspection
& rework |
| |
 |
M/C
breakdown |
| |
 |
Tool
not available |
| |
 |
Absenteeism
|
| |
 |
Low
employee involvement & teamwork |
| |
Leading
to: |
 |
Long
lead times and failure to meet delivery commitments |
 |
High
requirement of inventory & space |
 |
Excessive
time for corrective and preventive action |
 |
Lack
of control on production |
 |
Low
employee morale |
| |
|
| Recommendations
|
The
following action plan was recommended for improving the existing
situation: |
 |
Manufacture
in cells |
 |
Re-organise
for cellular manufacturing |
 |
Implement
Pull System of Planning |
 |
Reduce
set-up times to improve productivity |
 |
Implement
TPM to improve machine availability |
 |
Introduce
new measures of Performance |
 |
Involve
all employees to make continuous improvement and introduce reward/
recognition systems to motivate employees |
| |
|
Implementation
Methodology |
The
pipes and fitting group was selected as the pilot area for implementation
of cellular manufacturing which was carried out in the following
manner: |
 |
An
improved cellular layout of manufacture was designed |
 |
All
necessary machines were moved and re-organised for cellular manufacturing
|
 |
All
required bins and tools were placed appropriately for ease of flow
and operation |
 |
A
team of workmen was selected with one team leader to run and manage
the cell |
 |
The
team was provided training in flow concepts and the operation of
the cell. |
| |
|
Results
Obtained |
 |
Reduced
lead times, inventory and space requirement |
 |
Improved
delivery performance |
 |
Visual
control of production |
 |
Higher
employee morale and involvement |
 |
100%
increase in productivity |